Next: Practical Implementation
Up: The BioCluct Clustering Algorithm
Previous: Algorithm Running Time
Here we will give an outline of the proof. For the details of the proof please refer to [1].
Below we will show in some detail a result, which proves the last statement of the above outline.
Figure:
Schematic proof of the key observation. This figure depicts a graph G (blank), original clique graph H (green) and some other clique graph C (green with pattern). Consider
and
.
Each edge (u,v) which belongs to neither C nor to H, but belongs to G increments both
and
.
Each edge (u,v) which belongs to both C and H, but does not belong to G also increments both
and
.
Thus, the difference between
and
is due to patches that correspond to
.
Let us denote by
the symmetric difference constrained to edges in
.
But
.
Thus
iff
.
Hence,
iff
.
|
Peer Itsik
2001-02-01